Skip to content
PICO Portalanswers from OpenAlex

Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function”

PaperCitations, authors & open-access status

Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” is a paper indexed in PICO Portal from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” have?

PICO Portalcitation count

Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” has 0 citations in the OpenAlex counts PICO Portal stores.

When was Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” published?

PICO Portalyear

Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” has 2021 year in the PICO Portal index.

What is the open-access status of Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function”?

PICO Portaloa status

Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” has green oa status in the PICO Portal index.

What is the DOI of Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function”?

PICO Portaldoi

The DOI for Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” is on the source record.

What is the PMID of Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function”?

PICO Portalpmid

The PMID for Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function”?

PICO Portalopenalex

The OpenAlex for Reply to “Discussion of ‘Whey protein supplementation and its potentially adverse effects on health: a systematic review’ — Unsubstantiated claims of adverse effects of whey protein supplementation on human kidney and liver function” is on the source record.

Related on PICO Portal

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial