Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up
Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is a paper indexed in PICO Portal from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up have?
Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up has 146 citations in the OpenAlex counts PICO Portal stores.
When was Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up published?
Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up has 2021 year in the PICO Portal index.
What is the open-access status of Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?
Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up has hybrid oa status in the PICO Portal index.
What is the DOI of Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?
The DOI for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?
The PMID for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?
The OpenAlex for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is on the source record.