Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study
Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study is a paper indexed in PICO Portal from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study have?
Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study has 75 citations in the OpenAlex counts PICO Portal stores.
When was Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study published?
Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study has 2023 year in the PICO Portal index.
What is the open-access status of Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study?
Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study has hybrid oa status in the PICO Portal index.
What is the DOI of Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study?
The DOI for Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study?
The PMID for Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study?
The OpenAlex for Leadless versus transvenous single‐chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow‐up of the Micra CED study is on the source record.