Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is a paper indexed in PICO Portal from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials have?
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials has 106 citations in the OpenAlex counts PICO Portal stores.
When was Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials published?
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials has 2016 year in the PICO Portal index.
What is the open-access status of Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials has bronze oa status in the PICO Portal index.
What is the DOI of Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?
The DOI for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?
The PMID for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?
The OpenAlex for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is on the source record.