Skip to content
PICO Portalanswers from OpenAlex

Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies

PaperCitations, authors & open-access status

Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies is a paper indexed in PICO Portal from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies have?

PICO Portalcitation count

Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies has 21 citations in the OpenAlex counts PICO Portal stores.

When was Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies published?

PICO Portalyear

Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies has 2022 year in the PICO Portal index.

What is the open-access status of Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies?

PICO Portaloa status

Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies has gold oa status in the PICO Portal index.

What is the DOI of Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies?

PICO Portaldoi

The DOI for Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies is on the source record.

What is the PMID of Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies?

PICO Portalpmid

The PMID for Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies?

PICO Portalopenalex

The OpenAlex for Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies is on the source record.

Related on PICO Portal

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial