Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is a paper indexed in PICO Portal from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration have?
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration has 204 citations in the OpenAlex counts PICO Portal stores.
When was Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration published?
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration has 2006 year in the PICO Portal index.
What is the open-access status of Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration has bronze oa status in the PICO Portal index.
What is the DOI of Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
The DOI for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
The PMID for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
The OpenAlex for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is on the source record.